MANCHESTER UNITED BEST XI
Raw link
http://this11.com/boards/1265631161468425.jpg
Link for forums
[url=http://this11.com][img]http://this11.com/boards/1265631161468425.jpg[/img][/url]
HTML link
<a href"http://this11.com"><img src="http://this11.com/boards/1265631161468425.jpg" border="0" alt="Football Fans Know Better"/></a>
facebooktwitterfriendfeed
08.02.2010
Best Formation Manchester United played with this season!
Comments
08.02.2010
Debateable how this team should be taken.
:-)
I wouldn't say Nani has deserved to be in a season's best formation, or Park. For me, Berbatov and Giggs would be among the first on the team sheet. Rafael has shown a lot of spirit but is far from the finished article, still may be the best option United have currently got tho.
I personally think United are best with a 4-4-2 formation, with Scholes and Carrick prompting from midfield.
:-)
:-)
I wouldn't say Nani has deserved to be in a season's best formation, or Park. For me, Berbatov and Giggs would be among the first on the team sheet. Rafael has shown a lot of spirit but is far from the finished article, still may be the best option United have currently got tho.
I personally think United are best with a 4-4-2 formation, with Scholes and Carrick prompting from midfield.
:-)
15.02.2010
i would put rooney and nani up front, then park and orbaton on the wings, mid and defence is good
15.02.2010
Just to state the obvious, Billions ...
:-)
Rooney and Nani up front, Park and Obertan on the wings, keep the midfield and defence as is - a very nice 4-3-4 formation there. Errr ...
:-D
:-)
Rooney and Nani up front, Park and Obertan on the wings, keep the midfield and defence as is - a very nice 4-3-4 formation there. Errr ...
:-D
15.02.2010
LOL, ok that is how you would put it or see it, but as for me i see the two wingers as part of the midfield and not strike. SMF's
17.02.2010
@ Billions
My comment was more about making the point that you'd have 12 men on the pitch if you keep the midfield and defence the same, as you seem to be suggesting.
:-D
My comment was more about making the point that you'd have 12 men on the pitch if you keep the midfield and defence the same, as you seem to be suggesting.
:-D
17.02.2010
oh ok, yeh your right, it would be a 442 and not 433, still rooney and nani up front, 4 mids including the wingers.
So how do you think the MAN U and AC milan match went?
any second leg predictions?
So how do you think the MAN U and AC milan match went?
any second leg predictions?
17.02.2010
The result went as I'd probably expect, maybe not quite so many goals though. Milan are surely realising what a donkey Beckham is by now - was Capello in the crowd seeing him substituted after a limp performance?
I'd expect United to be physical and tight in the second leg, knowing they could afford to lose by the odd goal as long as it was a low scoring match.
:-)
I'd expect United to be physical and tight in the second leg, knowing they could afford to lose by the odd goal as long as it was a low scoring match.
:-)
Add a comment
Possibly related topics
- MANCHESTER CITY (1)
- Everton vs Manchester United @ 20/02/2010 (1)
- Manchester United vs ACMilan (1)
- Arsenal vs Manchester United @ 31.1.2009 (4)
- Manchester City v Manchester United - 19 Jan 2010 (2)
- Manchester City v Chelsea FC 5.12.2009 (7)
- Manchester United Attacking Style! (7)
- Manchester United 2019-2020
- Manchester United vs Arsenal (1)
- Manchester Utd 2009-10 Formation (6)


