Santiago Munez4-1-3-2 formation, similar to the Real Madrid formation in 2001-2003.

Berbatov as a target man.

Tevez as a second striker. In my opinion, he is better than Rooney.

Park (better than Nani, at the moment) and Ronaldo on the wings.

Carrick protecting the back 4 and/or acting as a deep lying play maker.

06.10.2008

trbwsFirst Manutd dont play 4-1-3-2 , second nani is better than park and maybe giggs and now thats not manutd formation manutd play 4-3-3 in 2008/2009 , and tevez and rooney the two are important and they play the same way , and brown is a RB this season for sure and Ronaldo is now changed his position to LMF or LWF or SS now to the left side.

07.10.2008

sp88As far as it goes, it's a nice looking formation.

The only thing I would say is that Carrick is more of a passer than a ball winner - he wouldn't provide much cover for the back line. Maybe Hargreaves would be a better option?

07.10.2008

GeorgieWasTheBestNow that Scholes is injured and out, we can play both Hargreaves and Carrick at the same time. Andersson can come in instead of Carrick against tougher opposition.

07.10.2008

sp88If it were 2 in the middle, who would your 1st choice pairing be with Scholes sidelined, Georgie? For me, it would be Carrick and Anderson. The little Brazilian's been a revelation so far.

07.10.2008

GeorgieWasTheBestDepends on who we play against. Anderson and Hargreaves if we need more resistance, Carrick and Hargreaves for softer opposition. I wouldn't play Anderson day in day out, as he is still young and developing.

07.10.2008

RedrebelTevez is not a natural second stiker.

07.10.2008

Santiago MunezAt the moment, I think Park is better than Nani. More consistent and doesn't give the ball away a lot. Giggs is slow nowadays.

08.10.2008