best coach 88in 5 midfielders will be more attack.
please tell me
Is this strong formation ???
(((please answer me and why?)))
02.10.2008
g9g9ok um 1st , your not a bestcoach ,and second this is a bad formation , all u have to is COMMENT PLEASE COMMENT IS THIS A STRONG FORMATION IS THIS A STRONG FORMATION , you just want comments that you and i see , discuss your form m8 not just saying comment plz , your forms are bad either , i think Trbws is Best man ,cuz he discuss every Formation 1 by 1 , and thats u got to say , Disscus your form m8 ,and your forms are bad , every form you draw saying in the discuss , PLZ COMMENT IS THIS A STRONG FORMATION IS THIS A STRONG FORMATION , PLZ TELL ME , PLZ COMMENT , m8 go make a real formation
02.10.2008
RedrebelI don't quite understand where you are putting the players, but if I am correct this is a 3-5-2 correct? The way you are aligning your players is unneccesary. You do not need 3 center-midfielders and than have two outside midfielders. You only have 3 center-midfielders when you got wingers because if they lose the ball in attack they need somebody to cover up the midfield and space they left. That is why Chelsea's standard formation is 4-3-3. You need to change your formation to a 4-4-2 because you have an extra player in midfield that is uneccesary. So, my answer to your question is that this formation has something wrong.
02.10.2008
best coach 88yes it's 3-5-2
02.10.2008
e1terror2tonathats weak but 3 strikers and put 1 as a cf and that will be good. . . . .
23.10.2008
e1terror2tonathat but was supose to be put sori for that lol
23.10.2008
