• Offensive Catenaccio Formation(1-3-4-2)

    This is the so called offensive "Catenaccio" formation. This is basically a 4-4-2, but there is something different in the defense. Instead of having a flat 4 you have a diamond 4. You got the left-back,right-back, sweeper, ...

    Redrebel | 15.11.2008 | Comments: 9


  • The best Arsenal formation?

    Is this the best possible Arsenal lineup, when everybody is ready to play?

    havardgooner | 08.11.2008 | Comments: 3


  • A Premier League XI

    It's more symmetrical than it should be, I know, but I reckon this would be a decent team for nice, flowing, attacking football. What do youse guys reckon?

    Robert O'Carlos | 19.11.2008 | Comments: 2


  • PES2009 my first perfect 11

    PES2009 my perfect eleven ... i think its a excellent formation. What do you Think?

    bestmanager75 | 30.10.2008 | Comments: 1


  • Very interesting formation(4-2-3-1)

    To me this formation looks very interesting. You have 2 attacking midfielders,a second striker, and a striker. You technically have 3 playmakers. So, I came to the questions. Can this formation work? Can it be creative? Can it be deadly? From my pers...

    Redrebel | 10.11.2008 | Comments: 14


  • 4-2-3-1 when attacking from right side

    I use this formation with my 95´s. Targetman uses wings on counter attacks.

    Juippi71 | 18.11.2008


  • Is Newcatle the new crayz gang?

    I guess we all saw Kinnear's touch on Newcastle tonight. They reminded me of Wimbledon in 90s. Troublesome players, long balls, a hopelessly talentless but scoring striker...Will Collonici be playing Guy Ritchie's movies?

    nvr | 28.10.2008 | Comments: 2


  • Suggestion

    For instance Cristiano Ronaldo starting wide right on the wing for Man Utd with an arrow pointing diagonally inwards to show that he looks to run towards goal when he's in play rather than running down the touchline for a cross.

    Robert O'Carlos | 16.11.2008


  • Offensive formation(2-4-4)

    If you look at this formation you can see that wing play would be abundant and dangerous, but if you look at the last line you see a problem. It's a back 2. A lot of you are going to say "nobody uses this formation anymore". And it is t...

    Redrebel | 08.11.2008 | Comments: 7


  • ?????

    2 and 3 are hackers who boot the ball up the other end if it comes near them. 4, 5 and 6 are DMs who try and pass the ball if they win it. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are all forwards who stay in formation as much as possible.Comments?

    Robert O'Carlos | 15.11.2008 | Comments: 2


  • Please, Dont try this Formation at home!

    People as i was saying this Formation is a Knocking-Out Formation , ppl This formation cost 6-0 over a team!. this is a 4-3-3 formation , try it at home:P,and also try it in a real match while your playing. What do you think about it?

    trbws | 31.10.2008 | Comments: 1


  • Why we call him Eric the King

    Our number 7s have been always somewhat special. This is a collection of Cantona's goals. I would still prefer him to Ronaldo. Would you?

    GeorgieWasTheBest | 01.11.2008 | Comments: 7